Home / Innovation / “Show me the money!” Sure, I’ll show you your losses

“Show me the money!” Sure, I’ll show you your losses

You can sense an audience’s reaction as you present ideas on innovation.

Sometimes its warm and engaging, sometimes distant and thoughtful, and occasionally remote and cynical.

I experienced all three reactions last week when presenting at a bank’s annual leadership conference, with the third being the reaction I like the least but enjoy debating the most.

This was a third of the way through my dialogue about how transactional branches need to be shut down as mobile delivery through contextual, intuitive servicing is the new focus.

A hand was raised in the audience, and this manager loudly opinioned: “this is all well and good, but where is the money?”

Ah … the old “show me the money” statement.

I’ve heard it regularly and, in fact, most regularly from this particular bank.

Purely due to time and structure, I couldn’t answer the question raised properly until the end of the presentation – this wasn’t meant to be an interactive workshop, maybe it should have been – and, as a result, the rest of the presentation had a mood change amongst everyone to: “show me the money”.

All the innovations I talk about regularly – new forms of currency, value exchange, hybrid real life and virtual economies, alternative commerce systems, the use of Big Data and the threat of those who get it, the mobile world of revolution from Africa to America, etc, etc – was now tainted with the undertone: “show me the money”.

An innovation presentation on the future of banking is not meant to be a presentation about the business case for new banking models, although maybe it should be.

I’ll work on it next year.

But here’s a story about why the “show me the money” crowd have the wrong focus.

There’s an old bar in my town called: “The Branch”.

It’s been there for hundred of years and has a regular and loyal crowd who drink there.

It’s always made money by selling nuts, crisps and sandwiches, along with high priced spirits and beers.

It doesn’t serve a decent wine, as no-one came to the Branch and asked for wine, but the beer is the focal point for the largely male crowd who attend there.

A few years ago, a little bistro place opened nearby called: “The Upstart”.

The Branch manager wasn’t particularly concerned about it.

After all, it was positioned totally differently to the Branch, in a different market with a different focus.

It served wine, when the Branch didn’t.

It served hot meals, when the Branch didn’t.

It was more like a restaurant than a bar, and it didn’t serve beer and didn’t have a loyal customer base.

So the Branch manager wasn’t worried about it.

He thought that the Upstart wouldn’t succeed and, even if it did, that it wouldn't affect the Branch's business.

The Upstart thought differently.

The Upstart didn’t know if it was going to make money, but had seen the idea of hot meals and wine working overseas and believed it could work here.

After a while, the Upstart had a few loyal customers.

They were mainly families, and these families often included people who previously went to the Branch.

These folks could not afford to have a night at the Upstart and at the Branch regularly, and slowly the loyal customer base of the Branch were all too often to be found in the Upstart’s premises.

Eventually, the Branch could see it was losing business and so the manager changed his ideas a little.

He began to serve wine and hot food.

But the crowd didn’t buy it.

They didn’t like the dark and old view they had from the Branch and soon it was abandoned, apart from a few loyal souls who were dedicated to their beer and sandwich.

Meanwhile, the Upstart was enjoying a buoyant business, with high margin food and wine purchases in volume, and so the new business was not only making a profit, but a substantial one.

The moral of the story is that, with innovation in banking, you shouldn’t necessarily look for the profits but should seek to avoid the losses.

The reason I say this is that banks are protected by bank licences which means they enjoy a monopoly.

This is why no new banks have opened for hundreds of years and why it is difficult for new entrants to get into banking. 

However, if new entrants erode the fringes of the banking model where they can enter, then it is often around the parts that make money, like credit and loans, insurances and mortgages.

This has been shown to be the case regularly through the past few decades and the danger is that all the bank will be left with is the loss-making deposit account of the corporate and consumer.

If that’s all you want, fine; but it’ll give you losses as you lose cross-sell opportunities.

From American Banker this month:

Moebs Services Inc estimate that the average checking account costs American banks $349 to manage, whilst the average revenue per account is just $268, implying a loss of $81.  Javelin Strategy & Research found that customers using online banking cost banks $192 a year, $167 less than customers not using online banking who cost $359 a year.

This is why banks need to fear the Upstart chipping away at their higher margin business as, in most cases, banks only have something to lose rather than gain.

 

About Chris M Skinner

Chris M Skinner
Chris Skinner is best known as an independent commentator on the financial markets through his blog, TheFinanser.com, as author of the bestselling book Digital Bank, and Chair of the European networking forum the Financial Services Club. He has been voted one of the most influential people in banking by The Financial Brand (as well as one of the best blogs), a FinTech Titan (Next Bank), one of the Fintech Leaders you need to follow (City AM, Deluxe and Jax Finance), as well as one of the Top 40 most influential people in financial technology by the Wall Street Journal’s Financial News. To learn more click here...

Check Also

The lakes, ponds, streams and brooks of finance

Jack Ma had a rant about the financial system ahead of Ant Group’s IPO. As …