Home / Digital Bank / Question: change the bank or launch a new bank?

Question: change the bank or launch a new bank?

So I was talking about the big challenges of creating a Digital Bank, and am reminded of the approaches that banks take to do this.

The first is the hardest, and it’s the one I described last week: transformation.

A transformational bank process – where the whole bank’s business model is turned on its head to move from physical to digital foundations – is just too difficult for most.  It is also too risky for most.  Hence, they fudge it.  They add budget to invest in digital whilst also investing in dusting up their branches, adding more people in compliance and audit, juggling the sale of non-core assets whilst also thinking about acquisition of new assets.   In other words, they are a bank that is spinning plates.

Spinning-plates

The trouble with this bank is that plates can often drop and, if too many plates require too much focus, that is likely to happen.  And that is what I think is happening with big incumbent banks thinking about evolution to digital.

First, the terminology is wrong.  They’re thinking about digital as a channel, appointing a head to run the digital function and assigning the function a budget.   Job done.

The thing is, as I said last week, the job is not done as this is a core foundation of the future bank, not an adjunct.  It’s not a channel or a function therefore.

The problem is that banks like to assign things to boxes, or plates continuing my prior metaphor.  So you have the digital bank plate; the retail bank plate (they look after the branches, which are separated from the digital plate); the regulation plate; the compliance plate; the payments plate; and so on.

All these plates are spinning separately, and all require attention.  As a result, some plates get dropped, but it doesn’t matter as long as you can pick it up and spin it again.  So the digital bank app is rolled out and now someone is demanding that you roll out the next service: the wearable app, the internet of things app, the data analytics program, etc.  You just start spinning a new plate and things keep going.

But it isn’t working long term as the new Fintech world isn’t spinning plates.  Instead, new startups are a plate to themselves.  They’re attacking the business by just having a plate on the table.  It’s not spinning and, as a result, it works non-stop to disrupt your spinning plates.

That’s what we’re seeing with these 1000s of new companies out there focusing just on digital, retail user experience, payment and so on.

This means that the multi-spinning universal bank is dropping its plates faster and faster thanks to regulation and innovation.  So what’s the answer?

Start a new bank of course.

I see a lot of incumbent banks feeling the frustration of spinning too many plates and, as digital demands transformation and it’s far too difficult, they’re investing in launching NewBank instead.  NewBank gets a big budget and spins out of old bank.

A good example of this one is Hello Bank, an offshoot of BNP Paribas.  Hello Bank was launched in May 2013, with the ambition of gaining 1.4 million customers by 2017 in Germany, Belgium, France and Italy of which two-thirds would be new customers to BNP, rather than existing account holders.

The bank invested €80 million in developing and launching the bank two years ago and, today, has already achieved a good number of customers.  Figures vary from anywhere between 800,000 today and 1.3 million, but one statistic that is freely quoted is that the bank has gained 350,000 customers in Belgium, heading towards 400,000, and 70% of customers do more than ten transactions per month.

These are impressive numbers and show that BNP has been serious about building the NewBank but, as the Financial Times points out, most bank rebrands fail: “the roll call of banks that have tried to do this is small and inauspicious. A wave of silly names accompanied the UK’s internet banking launches 15 years ago (Abbey National’s Cahoot, Halifax’s Intelligent Finance), now either ditched or side-lined.”

I think this is because they were not given the right investment and, although some failed, others have succeeded like First Direct (HSBC)  and Smile (Co-operative Bank), although the latter is also now likely to close due to its parent’s problems.

In both cases, and in the case of BNP’s Hello, the offshoot needs to run as a completely separate bank with a completely separate management team and budget to succeed.  It cannot just be a pilot or a project or an offshoot adjunct run under the core bank umbrella.  That’s the real difference between First Direct and Hello compared with Cahoot and Intelligent Finance.

So whether the bank is transforming or launching a NewBank, neither approach is easy and, as I’ve said before, it all comes back to leadership

Does your leader have the stomach to make the change happen?  Equally important, does your leader have the backing, the budget and the board behind them to make the change happen?

If yes, you’re good to go.  If no, what are you doing?

About Chris M Skinner

Chris M Skinner
Chris Skinner is best known as an independent commentator on the financial markets through his blog, the Finanser.com, as author of the bestselling book Digital Bank, and Chair of the European networking forum the Financial Services Club. He has been voted one of the most influential people in banking by The Financial Brand (as well as one of the best blogs), a FinTech Titan (Next Bank), one of the Fintech Leaders you need to follow (City AM, Deluxe and Jax Finance), as well as one of the Top 40 most influential people in financial technology by the Wall Street Journal’s Financial News. To learn more click here...

Check Also

If you’re getting something for free, you are the product

This quote If you’re getting something for free, you are the product has been floating …

  • Chris, what US Banks have been successful with creating a newBank, other than Customers Bank/BankMobile ? I am still stunned banks/cu’s have not tried to do this ‘offshoot’ model ~ especially tied in with a large college following/base. So much could be done with mobile first crowd; a solid workforce strategy -tech support and contact services; PFA™ (B Leimer coined phrase – love it!); student loan ‘managing’ development; lifetime customer value analytics and relations …. Let alone the eventual graduation, relocation (Better diversification of risk) and national brand loyalty.

  • I’m observing with pretty curiosity the wave of new challenger banks in UK (Staring, Mondo, Monese, Secco,…).
    I ask my self “Why big banks didn’t start to build from scratch a new full stack bank”. Notice, I mean to make a new bank really without add new abstact IT architecture layer on old legacy core banking system but create it from scratch (like starling).
    The problem of challengers is the trust (the majority of people don’t love leave money in strange brand).
    I’m strongly convinced that a bank like HCBC or Barklays built with new modern technologies (REST, API Native, javascript, NOSQL, Spark,……) could be disruptive in terms of new services performed in real time (i.e. if new document is generated by sustem put it on my dropbox, native multicurrency).
    Basically my idea is the creation of an hybrid between challenger and big bank: a big bank bring the brand and trust of customers, a challenger bring innovation, tech and no legacy people.
    I see many advanteges (i.e. IT cost for customers drammactly decrease, new services could be offered to customers) apart the excess staff…