Chris Skinner's blog

Shaping the future of finance

Trust, brand and money are different things

Chris Skinner Author Avatar
by

For some years there has been a lot of discussion about which brands consumers trust for banking.  Rather than banks, protagonists assert that it’s Apple who could win, as they have the #1 brand with millennials.  Alternatively it could just as easily be a Wal*Mart, Virgin, Google or someone else.

For some years, I’ve joined in with these discussions, but I’m not going to anymore.

This is because brand and trust in banking is confused and is often used the wrong way.

We talk about trust in brands, based upon consumer views of the world.  The world’s most trusted brands are the likes of Apple and Virgin, sure, but these are not banks.

Equally, banks talk about the one thing they have at their heart is trust, but banks do not mean trust in the sense of brand.

This is where it gets confusing, in terms of how we define trust.

Trust in banks is not the same as trust in brands.

Trust in brands is related to how much affinity we have as consumers with those brands.

The world’s best-loved brands are purely that because they have gained some form of iconic consumer desire status.

Nike, Porsche, Louis Vuitton, Coca-Cola, McDonalds are all great brands … but can they be trusted as stores of value?

Not in the same way as banks, and not with a trust in their monetary store in the same way as the trust in their brand.

Banks are not trusted as brands – in the latest lists of top brands with millennials you won’t even see a bank in the list – but they are trusted stores of value.

It is this latter point that banks focus upon.

Their sense of trust is not with their brand, but with their state-backed guarantee that they won’t lose your money.

Banks are guaranteed to keep your money safe.

No trusted brand has that guarantee.

Therefore, you can have your iTunes or iCloud account compromised, and Apple’s only sense of shame is a reputational hit on your trust in their brand. They have no duty to compensate you for your loss of reputation or value (take note Jennifer Lawrence).

And this is where the fundamental chasm lies in the arguments about consumers running away and trusting non-banks with their money.  It may be true that they love these non-bank brands but, as consumers grow up, they become more and more aware of the sensitivity to monetary flows and start to care about their value stores trust worthiness, in terms of their guarantees as safe deposit stores.

For example, in a conversation about youngsters the other day, a colleague said that they were encouraged to bring their teenage children to a bank conference recently.

When they got there, the teenagers were invited on stage to discuss banks and bank brands and, unsurprisingly, none of the kids knew anything about a bank.

“Do you not remember that one of the banks has a brand with a black horse?” they were quizzed.

“No idea”, they replied.

That is because, for most youngsters, banks are irrelevant.

Banks become relevant when you get a job, as most employers want to pay direct into your bank account, but that still does not make them out.

No.  A bank only really comes into its own trusted space when you need to save or invest or when you lose money.

When a payment goes wrong.  When you need to reverse a transaction.  When you need to challenge a charge.  When you need a loan.  When you need to find a way to leverage credit.

That’s where banks are trusted, as state-guaranteed and licenced institutions.

So it’s not the bank brands we trust, but their guaranteed status as stores of value.

Show me a trusted brand that has that guarantee on their store of value, and that’s when you may find a non-bank brand truly threatening banking.

But then the non-bank brand will need a bank licence to do that and, at that point, they are a bank anyway, so it is all the same.

In summary, trust in a brand is not the same as trust in a bank.  For this reason, when we talk about trust, we need to be clear that it is different in the context to which it applies.

 

UncategorizedCategories
Chris Skinner Author Avatar

Chris M Skinner

Chris Skinner is best known as an independent commentator on the financial markets through his blog, TheFinanser.com, as author of the bestselling book Digital Bank, and Chair of the European networking forum the Financial Services Club. He has been voted one of the most influential people in banking by The Financial Brand (as well as one of the best blogs), a FinTech Titan (Next Bank), one of the Fintech Leaders you need to follow (City AM, Deluxe and Jax Finance), as well as one of the Top 40 most influential people in financial technology by the Wall Street Journal's Financial News. To learn more click here...

What is the future?

Learn more

Learn more about Chris

About Chris Skinner

The Past, Present And Future Of Banking, Finance And Technology

Fintech expert Chris Skinner: countries need digital transformation to remain competitive

Join me on Linkedin

Follow Me on X!

Hire Chris Skinner for dinners, workshops and more

Learn directly from from one of the most influential people in technology, gain insights from the world's most innovative companies, and build a global network.

Chris’s latest book

Chris Skinner’s ‘Digital For Good’ Book Launch Event – CFTE

Top 50 Global Thought Leaders and Influencers on FinTech 2023

Chris Skinner
Commentator, CEO of The Finanser and best-selling author at The Finanser

Thinkers360 Thought Leader

Contact Me

Global Awards

Lifetime Achievement Award

Global 100 - 2024 Winner

Chris Skinner - Financial Markets Advisor of the Year - The Finanser - UK 2023

Best Financial Markets Advisor of the Year 2023

30 Best Regtech Blogs and Websites 2023

Kids creating the future bank | TEDxAthens

Captain Cake and the Candy Crew

Captain Cake Winner of a Golden Mom’s Choice Award

TWO-TIME WINNER OF A MOM’S CHOICE GOLD AWARD!

Alex at the Financial Services

Gaping Void's Hugh MacLeod worked with the Finanser